<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Genotoxic Archives - EMFSA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/genotoxic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/genotoxic/</link>
	<description>Electromagnetic fields South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>BioInitiative Report 2020: Updated Research Summaries (September 2020)</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/bioinitiative-report-2020-updated-research-summaries-september-2020/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research and Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioinitiative Report 2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELF-EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genotoxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=16152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Updated Research Summaries September 10th, 2020 These are invaluable sets of abstracts and tables covering the RFR and ELF-EMF/Static Field studies of the genetic and neurological literature, on studies of free radicals (oxidative damage), on comet assay studies, and on electrohypersensitivitity. Three graphics show summaries of Effect vs No Effect by percent comparison. The trend [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/bioinitiative-report-2020-updated-research-summaries-september-2020/">BioInitiative Report 2020: Updated Research Summaries (September 2020)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bioinitiative-2020.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16153" width="483" height="131" srcset="https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bioinitiative-2020.jpg 434w, https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bioinitiative-2020-300x82.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 483px) 100vw, 483px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Updated Research Summaries</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">September 10th, 2020</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">These are invaluable sets of abstracts and tables covering the RFR and ELF-EMF/Static Field studies of the genetic and neurological literature, on studies of free radicals (oxidative damage), on comet assay studies, and on electrohypersensitivitity. Three graphics show summaries of Effect vs No Effect by percent comparison.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">The trend continues that the great majority of studies report biological effects of low-intensity exposures to both ELF-EMF/Static Field and RFR.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Please see&nbsp;<a href="https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/">Research Summaries in the menu to download new files for 2020</a>. The RFR Research Summary (1990-2017) and chapter on Electrohypersensitivity Abstracts (2017) have not been updated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">New graphics bring current the comparison of studies reporting “Effect vs No Effect” provide a quick look at the number of overall studies, the number and percentage showing “Effect” and the number and percent showing “No Effect”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Clearly the trend continues that the great majority of studies report effects of low-intensity exposures to both ELF-EMF and RFR, and a small percentage of published studies report that no effects are seen.<br>The new 2019 summaries and graphics which have been updated include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2-ELF-EMF_Static-Field-Free-Radical-Oxidatve-Damage-Abstracts-2020.docx.pdf">ELF-EMF_Static Field Free Radical ( Oxidatve Damage) Abstracts (2020)</a><ul><li>(229 studies, 203 (89%) E, 26(11%) NE)</li></ul></li><li><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/3-RFR-Free-Radical-Oxidative-Damage-Abstracts-2020.pdf">RFR Free Radical (Oxidative Damage) Abstracts (2020)</a><ul><li>(225 studies, 203 (89%) E, 26(11%) NE)</li></ul></li><li><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Lai-Geno-Percent-Graphic-2019.pdf">Graphic Percent Comparison Showing “Effect vs No Effect” on Genotoxic Effects</a></li><li><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Literature-on-neurological-effects-of-static-and-extremely.docx">ELF-EMF Neurological Effects abstracts</a><ul><li>229 studies, 208 (91%) E; 21 (9%) NE</li></ul></li><li><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/6-RFR-Neurological-Effects-Abstracts-2020.pdf">RFR Neurological Effects Abstracts (2020)</a><ul><li>(305 studies, 222 (72%) E, 83 (28%) NE)</li></ul></li><li> <a href="https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Lai-Neuro-Percent-Graphic-August-2019.docx">Graphic Percent Comparison Showing “Effect vs No Effect” on Neurological Effects</a></li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Source: </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/">https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px"><em>© Copyright 2006 &#8211; 2020 BioInitiative Report, All Rights Reserved. Site by Daveworks Inc.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/bioinitiative-report-2020-updated-research-summaries-september-2020/">BioInitiative Report 2020: Updated Research Summaries (September 2020)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/genotoxic-carcinogenic-effects-non-ionizing-electromagnetic-fields/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research and Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carcinogenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genotoxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=4172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kocaman A, Altun G, Kaplan AA, Deniz ÖG, Yurt KK, Kaplan S. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Environ Res. 2018 May;163:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 22. PMID: 29427953. Abstract New technologies in electronics and communications are continually emerging. An increasing use of these electronic devices such as mobile phone, computer, wireless [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/genotoxic-carcinogenic-effects-non-ionizing-electromagnetic-fields/">Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kocaman A, Altun G, Kaplan AA, Deniz ÖG, Yurt KK, Kaplan S. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Environ Res. 2018 May;163:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 22. PMID: 29427953.</p>
<div class="abstr">
<h6>Abstract</h6>
<div class="">
<p>New technologies in electronics and communications are continually emerging. An increasing use of these electronic devices such as mobile phone, computer, wireless fidelity connectors or cellular towers is raising questions concerning whether they have an adverse effect on the body. Exposure to electromagnetic fields (<span class="highlight">EMF</span>) is frequently suggested to have adverse <span class="highlight">health</span> effects on humans and other organisms. This idea has been reported in many studies. In contrast, the therapeutic effects of <span class="highlight">EMF</span> on different organs have also been reported. Research findings are inconsistent. This has given rise to very profound discrepancies. The duration and frequency of mobile phone calls and the association observed with various <span class="highlight">health</span> effects has raised serious concerns due to the frequency with which these devices are used and the way they are held close to the head. The present review assesses the results of in vitro, in vivo, experimental, and epidemiological studies. The purpose of the study is to assess data concerning the carcinogenic and genotoxic effects of non-ionizing <span class="highlight">EMF</span>. The major genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of <span class="highlight">EMF</span>, divided into subsections as low frequency effects and radiofrequency effects, were reviewed. The inconsistent results between similar studies and the same research groups have made it very difficult to make any comprehensive interpretation. However, evaluation of current studies suggests that <span class="highlight">EMF</span> may represent a serious source of concern and may be hazardous to living organisms. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29427953">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29427953</a></p>
<div class="keywords">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/genotoxic-carcinogenic-effects-non-ionizing-electromagnetic-fields/">Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
