PDF: https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Creasey-WA-Goldberg-RB-2001-A-new-twist-on-an-old-mechanism-for-EMF-bioeffects.pdf

The post Creasey WA, Goldberg RB 2001- A new twist on an old mechanism for EMF appeared first on EMFSA.

Study pdf

https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Panagopoulos-UMTS-Caffeine-blood-lymphocytes-GPB-1.pdf

Explanatory text

A single 15 min exposure to third generation (3G) Mobile Telephony (MT) Electromagnetic Field (EMF)/radiation from a commercially available mobile phone during a usual phone call in “talk” mode at 1 cm distance, induced a little more but comparable chromosomal damage (chromatid gaps and breaks) in human peripheral blood lymphocytes than a very high caffeine dose (~ 290 times above the permissible single dose for an adult human).

The combination of the caffeine dose and the MT EMF exposure increased dramatically the number of aberrations compared to the effect of each stressor alone. The combined effect increased with increasing exposure duration to the MT EMF.

Thus, MT EMF exposure ~136 times below the ICNIRP 2020 limit exerts a genotoxic action in human/animal cells even greater than that of a caffeine dose ~290 times above the corresponding limit. Assuming the caffeine limit to be correct, the limit for MT EMFs should thus be lowered by at least 4x 10⁴ (forty thousand) times (136×290) for short-term exposures, and 4×10⁶ (four million) times for long-term exposures. [3G is still the most usual type of MT radiation, since even the newest 4G devices employ the 4G (LTE) only for internet, and use 3G for telephony].

The post Comparing chromosome damage induced by mobile telephony radiation and a high caffeine dose: Effect of combination and exposure duration appeared first on EMFSA.

Notice of Retraction From IEEE Xplore®

“Electromagnetic Radiation Due to Cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Technologies: How Safe Are We?”
by Naren, A. Elhence, V. Chamola and M. Guizani
in IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 42980-43000

After careful and considered review, this article has been found to be in violation of IEEE’s Publication Principles. IEEE hereby retracts the content of this article. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all references to this article. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9016183/references

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9016183

The above paper, besides the useful technical information it provides, seems to contain serious errors:

One of the most serious is that it underestimates the intensity emitted by cell phones which is 10-100 times stronger than that shown in the graphs of the paper.

The correct levels are many times presented in Panagopoulos’ experimental papers.

Image source:  Panagopoulos, Springer  https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Panagopoulos-Springer-2017-chapter.pdf

Another serious point is that the authors recommend the use of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth (Table 7), while experts worldwide recommend strictly wired connections for internet, and no use of Bluetooth.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223/full

The paper by Naren et al recommends shielded clothing for children and pregnant women.

We advise caution.

In addition:

Panagopoulos-Chrousos-2019-STOTEN (4)

Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos: Electromagnetic Fields – Health Effects – Mechanism of Action

The post Concerns about IEEE paper appeared first on EMFSA.

The post Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos: Electromagnetic Fields – Health Effects – Mechanism of Action appeared first on EMFSA.