<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polarization Archives - EMFSA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/polarization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/polarization/</link>
	<description>Electromagnetic fields South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Nonuniform Exposure to the Cornea from Millimeter Waves</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/nonuniform-exposure-to-the-cornea-from-millimeter-waves/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research and Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[94-100 GHz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facial Tissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICNIRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millimeter waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonlethal Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperature Increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Lesions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=20269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Foster KR, Laakso I, Chalfin S. Nonuniform Exposure to the Cornea from Millimeter Waves. Health Phys. 2021 May 1;120(5):525-531. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001376. PMID: 33760769. Abstract This study examines the nonuniform exposure to the cornea from incident millimeter waves at 94-100 GHz. Two previous studies measured temperature increases in the rhesus cornea exposed to brief (1-6 s) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/nonuniform-exposure-to-the-cornea-from-millimeter-waves/">Nonuniform Exposure to the Cornea from Millimeter Waves</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px"><strong>Foster KR, Laakso I, Chalfin S. Nonuniform Exposure to the Cornea from Millimeter Waves. Health Phys. 2021 May 1;120(5):525-531. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001376. PMID: 33760769.</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" style="font-size:14px">Abstract</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">This study examines the nonuniform exposure to the cornea from incident millimeter waves at 94-100 GHz. Two previous studies measured temperature increases in the rhesus cornea exposed to brief (1-6 s) pulses of high-fluence millimeter waves (94 GHz), one of which also estimated thresholds for corneal damage (reported as ED50, the dose resulting in a visible lesion 50% of the time). Both studies noted large variations in the temperature increase across the surface of the cornea due to wave interference effects. This study examines this variability using high-resolution simulations of mm-wave absorption and temperature increase in the human cornea from exposures to plane wave energy at 100 GHz. Calculations are based on an earlier study. The simulations show that the peak temperature increases in the cornea from short exposures (up to 10 s) to high-intensity mm-wave pulses are 1.7-2.8 times the median increase depending on the polarization of the incident energy. A simple one-dimensional &#8220;baseline&#8221; model provides a good estimate of the median temperature increase in the cornea. Two different estimates are presented for the thresholds for producing thermal lesions, expressed in terms of the minimum fluence of incident 100 GHz pulses. The first estimate is based on thresholds for thermal damage from pulsed infrared energy, and the second is based on a thermal damage model. The mm-wave pulses presently considered far exceed current IEEE or ICNIRP exposure limits but may be produced by some nonlethal weapons systems. Interference effects due to wave reflections from structures in and near the eye result in highly localized variations in energy absorbed in the cornea and surrounding facial tissues and are important to consider in a hazard analysis for exposures to intense pulsed millimeter waves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Copyright © 2021 Health Physics Society.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33760769/">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33760769/</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/nonuniform-exposure-to-the-cornea-from-millimeter-waves/">Nonuniform Exposure to the Cornea from Millimeter Waves</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/review-comparing-dna-damage-induced-by-mobile-telephony-and-other-types-of-man-made-electromagnetic-fields/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research and Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drosophila melanogaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microwaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=7984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research Volume 781, July–September 2019, Pages 53-62 Dimitris J.Panagopoulosabc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.003 Abstract The number of studies showing adverse effects on living organisms induced by different types of man-made Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) has increased tremendously. Hundreds of peer reviewed published studies show a variety of effects, the most important being DNA damage which is linked to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/review-comparing-dna-damage-induced-by-mobile-telephony-and-other-types-of-man-made-electromagnetic-fields/">Review: Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a class="publication-title-link" title="Go to Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research on ScienceDirect" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13835742">Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Go to table of contents for this volume/issue" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13835742/781/supp/C">Volume 781</a>, July–September 2019, Pages 53-62</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a class="author size-m workspace-trigger" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574218300991?via%3Dihub#!" name="baut0005"><span class="content"><span class="text given-name">Dimitris J.</span><span class="text surname">Panagopoulos</span><span id="baff0005" class="author-ref"><sup>a</sup></span><span id="baff0010" class="author-ref"><sup>b</sup></span><span id="baff0015" class="author-ref"><sup>c</sup></span></span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.003</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Abstract</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The number of studies showing adverse effects on living organisms induced by different types of man-made <a title="Learn more about Electromagnetism" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/electromagnetism">Electromagnetic Fields</a> (EMFs) has increased tremendously. Hundreds of peer reviewed published studies show a variety of effects, the most important being DNA damage which is linked to cancer, <a title="Learn more about Degenerative Disease" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/degenerative-disease">neurodegenerative diseases</a>, reproductive declines etc. Those studies that are far more effective in showing effects employ real-life Mobile Telephony (MT) exposures emitted by commercially available mobile phones. The present review &#8211; of results published by my group from 2006 until 2016 &#8211; compares <a title="Learn more about DNA Fragmentation" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/dna-fragmentation">DNA fragmentation</a> induced by six different EMFs on the same biological system &#8211; the <a title="Learn more about Oogenesis" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/oogenesis">oogenesis</a> of <a title="Learn more about Drosophila" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/drosophila">Drosophila</a> melanogaster &#8211; under identical conditions and procedures. Such a direct comparison between different EMFs &#8211; especially those employed in daily life &#8211; on the same biological endpoint, is very useful for drawing conclusions on their <a title="Learn more about Biological Activity" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/biological-activity">bioactivity</a>, and novel. It shows that real MT EMFs are far more damaging than 50 Hz alternating magnetic field (MF) &#8211; similar or much stronger to those of power lines &#8211; or a pulsed <a title="Learn more about Electric Field" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/electric-fields">electric field</a> (PEF) found before to increase fertility. The MT EMFs were significantly more bioactive even for much shorter exposure durations than the other EMFs. Moreover, they were more damaging than previously tested <a title="Learn more about Cytotoxic Agent" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/cytotoxic-agent">cytotoxic agents</a> like certain chemicals, <a title="Learn more about Starvation Response" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/starvation-response">starvation</a>, <a title="Learn more about Dehydration" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/dehydration">dehydration</a>. Individual parameters of the real MT EMFs like intensity, frequency, exposure duration, <a title="Learn more about Polarization" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/polarization">polarization</a>, pulsing, <a title="Learn more about Modulation" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/modulation">modulation</a>, are discussed in terms of their role in bioactivity. The crucial parameter for the intense bioactivity seems to be the extreme variability of the polarized MT signals, mainly due to the large unpredictable intensity changes.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Note added by EMFSA:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Dr. George Carlo: &#8220;<em>This new paper by Dr. Panagopoulos clearly describes and documents the mechanistic aspects that underscore why man-made, polarized waveforms can cause so many different types of adverse biological effects. This is key. While focused on genetic outcomes, the impact triggers described in the paper apply across the board to organelles, cells, tissues, organs and organ systems. This is a foundation that will be key to any and all risk a</em><span class="text_exposed_show"><em>ssessments as well as derivations of any and all safety standards.</em>&#8220;</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span class="text_exposed_show">Last paragraph of conclusion of paper: &#8220;<em>The present study further confirms my previous results and conclusions that experiments should employ real-life and not simulated EMFs, and human/animal exposure to microwave telecommunication EMFs should be drastically reduced by prudent use, and establishment of much stringer exposure limits by the responsible health authorities.</em>&#8220;</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/research-and-studies/review-comparing-dna-damage-induced-by-mobile-telephony-and-other-types-of-man-made-electromagnetic-fields/">Review: Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
