<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dr Christopher J Portier Archives - EMFSA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/dr-christopher-j-portier-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/tag/dr-christopher-j-portier-2/</link>
	<description>Electromagnetic fields South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 21:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Murray (et al.) v. Motorola (et al.) Defense Seeks To Bar Portier Testimony</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/murray-et-al-v-motorola-et-al-defense-seeks-to-bar-portier-testimony/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Christopher J Portier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert Witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray et al. v. Motorola et al.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=20190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Source: Microwave News https://microwavenews.com/papers/chris-portier-rf-evaluation Excerpt April 1, 2021 Defense Seeks To Bar Portier Testimony As expected, defense lawyers have asked the DC court to not allow Christopher Portier to be an expert witness in this case. In a&#160;filing&#160;yesterday, the team representing the cell phone industry, argued that, “[A]llowing a new expert four months before the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/murray-et-al-v-motorola-et-al-defense-seeks-to-bar-portier-testimony/">Murray (et al.) v. Motorola (et al.) Defense Seeks To Bar Portier Testimony</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Source:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Microwave News <a href="https://microwavenews.com/papers/chris-portier-rf-evaluation">https://microwavenews.com/papers/chris-portier-rf-evaluation</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Excerpt</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px"><strong>April 1, 2021</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px"><strong>Defense Seeks To Bar Portier Testimony</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">As expected, defense lawyers have asked the DC court to not allow Christopher Portier to be an expert witness in this case.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">In a&nbsp;<a href="https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/MvM%20Def%20response%20to%20Portier.Mr.31.2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">filing</a>&nbsp;yesterday, the team representing the cell phone industry, argued that, “[A]llowing a new expert four months before the long-planned&nbsp;<em>Daubert</em>&nbsp;hearing would disrupt the existing schedule and unfairly prejudice Defendants.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">The filing was signed by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mwe.com/people/dee-pc-terrence-j/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Terry Dee</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mwe.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">McDermott Will &amp; Emery</a>&nbsp;in Chicago on behalf of himself and 37 other lawyers at 23 law firms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Portier was retained by the plaintiff attorneys in March 15, 2015 with the payment of a $5,000 retainer. It is not clear why his report was filed last month, close to six years later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">No word on when the judge may rule on Portier’s participation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/murray-et-al-v-motorola-et-al-defense-seeks-to-bar-portier-testimony/">Murray (et al.) v. Motorola (et al.) Defense Seeks To Bar Portier Testimony</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably carcinogenic</title>
		<link>https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Christopher J Portier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gliomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICNIRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray et al v Motorola]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.emfsa.co.za/?p=19914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Source: Posted on March 15th, 2021 Dariusz Leszczynski: I have written, on several occasions, about the differences between ICNIRP opinions and opinions of ICNIRP members when placed in non-ICNIRP scientific committees. There is something wrong with ICNIRP, that operates in detachment from science in general and thrives thanks to the support from the German government [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/">This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably carcinogenic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Source: </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="937" height="298" src="https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BRHP.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19915" srcset="https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BRHP.jpg 937w, https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BRHP-300x95.jpg 300w, https://www.emfsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BRHP-768x244.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 937px) 100vw, 937px" /></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-link is-provider-brhp-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place wp-block-embed-brhp-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/">This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably&nbsp;carcinogenic</a>
</div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Posted on March 15th, 2021</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Dariusz Leszczynski:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">I have written, on several occasions, about the differences between ICNIRP opinions and opinions of ICNIRP members when placed in non-ICNIRP scientific committees. There is something wrong with ICNIRP, that operates in detachment from science in general and thrives thanks to the support from the German government and telecom industry umbrella organizations as MWF and GSMA. Here are few examples of ICNIRP-bubble…</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2021/02/18/clear-indication-that-icnirp-review-of-science-is-skewed-and-should-be-independently-validated/">Clear indication that ICNIRP review of science is skewed and should be independently&nbsp;validated</a></li><li><a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2021/01/26/berneis-disagrees-with-icnirp/">BERENIS disagrees with&nbsp;ICNIRP</a></li><li><a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/12/10/leszczynski-statement-on-the-need-for-validation-of-icnirps-review-of-science/">Leszczynski: Statement on the need for validation of ICNIRP’s review of science</a></li><li><a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/09/08/leszczynski-there-is-something-utterly-wrong-with-the-icnirp-membership/">Leszczynski: There is something utterly wrong with the ICNIRP&nbsp;membership</a></li><li><a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/09/05/significant-discrepancy-of-opinions-on-5g-and-health-between-icnirp-and-the-health-council-of-the-netherlands/">Significant discrepancy of opinions on 5G and health between ICNIRP and the Health Council of the&nbsp;Netherlands</a></li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>…and a news message from Joel Moskowitz…</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px"><strong>Christopher J. Portier</strong>, former director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and a scientific advisor for the World Health Organization (WHO), recently completed an expert report on brain tumor risk from exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation used in cellphone technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph" style="font-size:14px">Read more at: <a href="https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/">https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za/news/this-is-big-news-from-usa-yet-another-expert-considers-rf-as-probably-carcinogenic/">This is Big News from USA: Yet another expert considers RF as probably carcinogenic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.emfsa.co.za">EMFSA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
